Thursday, June 4, 2009

Update

The ID Supreme Court has granted review in State v. Munoz.
(See 3-25 SCOIDBlog: "Unexplained Inconsistent and Irreconcilable Testimony Made Under Oath at Different Proceedings Cannot be Deemed Credible.") This is the case where the COA states that "[i]n our view, a witness who has testified under oath to patently inconsistent descriptions of events and has not offered any explanation for the inconsistency cannot be deemed 'credible' in either instance."

Good luck Corey and his attorney Robyn Fyffe.

No comments:

Post a Comment